We don’t really know the risks are small, even if the risks of adverse events in the short term are small. This is brand new tech and animal studies suggest longer term risks such as ADE as well as other immune dysfunction may arise for significant numbers of people. Also from animal studies, repeated exposure to the antigen (eg boosters) increases the risk of adverse event. It probably won’t kill you right away, but we are looking at unbounded downside risk here. It’s true that one needs proportion in one’s life, but it’s a mistake to underestimate the potential harms from these shots at both the individual and population level (eg immune escape).
Part of the problem (a large part) is that you aren't signing up for a one-and-done treatment. By complying, you've given your employer the green light to medicate you in perpetuity. Boost away! After complying, whatever potential vaccine exemption request you may have had just got flushed down the toilet.
Dr. Peter McCollough, Nov 8:
"With injection #1, injection #2, maybe the body can handle those ok, maybe there's not much of a problem to humans, but what about injections 3 and 4 and an ongoing basis? I can tell you as an internist, a cardiologist, an epidemiologist, one who has reviewed thousands of reports; it would be my projection that if we get on a chronic booster program on the current generation of vaccines that cause an unbridled, unchecked, uncontrolled production of the Wuhan spike protein in the human body, and this is done on any regular basis, that individuals who do take these injections will have a very high risk of chronic disease."
You KNOW the forced boosters are coming next. Why should I not heed McCollough's warning? He seems like a credible source of information to me. We know beyond any doubt that the medical "expert" class doesn't know what they are doing. We know they don't acknowledge mistakes or change direction with new data. We know the bureaucracy would absolutely care less if we all died horribly tomorrow. We know they are in this too deep to ever save face and reverse course. Maybe you'll be fine on your endless experimental booster program, but it sounds to me like there is legitimate reason to believe the Pfizer subscription we are being forced into may itself grind us into dust.
If I have to downsize my house to stay out of the Pfizer booster experiments, so be it.
I appreciate the intent, but my heels are firmly dug in for a number of reasons. Some scientists have hypothesized that the injections are going to result in immune dysfunction over the next 2-5 years. So if we survive the first 2, and multiple "boosts" thereafter, there is the possibility that we are never returning to a baseline level of health. A Canadian prof put out a short video on the toxicity of the nano particle itself. What is the cut-off for the human body? He suggested nobody knows. I can't find it nor his name. I've too many bookmarks after the past year of digging. He's from Queens U, I think. I am also opposed to giving my body up to government via a vaccine passport. This is repugnant on many levels. As CalvinistSaint discusses in their post, this is not a two-shot deal. There is no off-ramp. I also have zero trust in pharma, after seeing the fraud they perpetuated, including Pfizer in the current trial. My trust was already pretty low, as I had some experience working with them, while a research assistant at a psychiatric hospital. My anxiety of submitting to these injections, is greater than my fear of what will happen to us if we lose our jobs. I also keep thinking, if we can hold out a while longer, the truth will be impossible to hide. At that point, I'd prefer to be a jab-virgin when the bad guys are outed.
Respectfully, we have no idea what the real risks are, but they’re not small. The latest data out of the UK has vaccinated English adults under 60 dying at twice the rate of unvaccinated people the same age.
Steve Kirsh's statistical team, looking at Adverse Events and applying an appropriately calculated URF (under reporting factor of 41) - following the standard rules of the agencies prior guidance before they decided they didn't want to look for ANY signals in the data from THESE vaccines -- calculated lowest AE rate for Pfizer. They are materially different in the # of AEs.
We don’t really know the risks are small, even if the risks of adverse events in the short term are small. This is brand new tech and animal studies suggest longer term risks such as ADE as well as other immune dysfunction may arise for significant numbers of people. Also from animal studies, repeated exposure to the antigen (eg boosters) increases the risk of adverse event. It probably won’t kill you right away, but we are looking at unbounded downside risk here. It’s true that one needs proportion in one’s life, but it’s a mistake to underestimate the potential harms from these shots at both the individual and population level (eg immune escape).
Part of the problem (a large part) is that you aren't signing up for a one-and-done treatment. By complying, you've given your employer the green light to medicate you in perpetuity. Boost away! After complying, whatever potential vaccine exemption request you may have had just got flushed down the toilet.
Dr. Peter McCollough, Nov 8:
"With injection #1, injection #2, maybe the body can handle those ok, maybe there's not much of a problem to humans, but what about injections 3 and 4 and an ongoing basis? I can tell you as an internist, a cardiologist, an epidemiologist, one who has reviewed thousands of reports; it would be my projection that if we get on a chronic booster program on the current generation of vaccines that cause an unbridled, unchecked, uncontrolled production of the Wuhan spike protein in the human body, and this is done on any regular basis, that individuals who do take these injections will have a very high risk of chronic disease."
Start at 4:50:
https://www.americaoutloud.com/covid-19-vaccination-stop-now-before-its-too-late/
Here's Robert Malone saying something in a similar vein:
https://twitter.com/Kukicat7/status/1446604315154599938
You KNOW the forced boosters are coming next. Why should I not heed McCollough's warning? He seems like a credible source of information to me. We know beyond any doubt that the medical "expert" class doesn't know what they are doing. We know they don't acknowledge mistakes or change direction with new data. We know the bureaucracy would absolutely care less if we all died horribly tomorrow. We know they are in this too deep to ever save face and reverse course. Maybe you'll be fine on your endless experimental booster program, but it sounds to me like there is legitimate reason to believe the Pfizer subscription we are being forced into may itself grind us into dust.
If I have to downsize my house to stay out of the Pfizer booster experiments, so be it.
I appreciate the intent, but my heels are firmly dug in for a number of reasons. Some scientists have hypothesized that the injections are going to result in immune dysfunction over the next 2-5 years. So if we survive the first 2, and multiple "boosts" thereafter, there is the possibility that we are never returning to a baseline level of health. A Canadian prof put out a short video on the toxicity of the nano particle itself. What is the cut-off for the human body? He suggested nobody knows. I can't find it nor his name. I've too many bookmarks after the past year of digging. He's from Queens U, I think. I am also opposed to giving my body up to government via a vaccine passport. This is repugnant on many levels. As CalvinistSaint discusses in their post, this is not a two-shot deal. There is no off-ramp. I also have zero trust in pharma, after seeing the fraud they perpetuated, including Pfizer in the current trial. My trust was already pretty low, as I had some experience working with them, while a research assistant at a psychiatric hospital. My anxiety of submitting to these injections, is greater than my fear of what will happen to us if we lose our jobs. I also keep thinking, if we can hold out a while longer, the truth will be impossible to hide. At that point, I'd prefer to be a jab-virgin when the bad guys are outed.
This is the Canadian doc whom I referred to in another post:
https://www.marktaliano.net/covid-mrna-shots-are-a-technology-designed-to-poison-people-canadian-doctor/
Respectfully, we have no idea what the real risks are, but they’re not small. The latest data out of the UK has vaccinated English adults under 60 dying at twice the rate of unvaccinated people the same age.
This article I wrote (and several others) may be helpful to the question...if you are forced to take it.
https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/how-to-reduce-jab-injury-risk?r=lo15j&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=copy
Interestingly I come from Iraq and have lived through a version of this before.
What hill, if any, on our road to slavery is worth dying on, exactly?
Steve Kirsh's statistical team, looking at Adverse Events and applying an appropriately calculated URF (under reporting factor of 41) - following the standard rules of the agencies prior guidance before they decided they didn't want to look for ANY signals in the data from THESE vaccines -- calculated lowest AE rate for Pfizer. They are materially different in the # of AEs.