This woman may have a PHD (and from her comments she seems to think that makes her smarter/wiser than those without a PHD ) in medicine but she's just as susceptible as anyone else to the mass hysteria that forces people into believing a lie like the one the government has been pushing about covid. Where she falls short is where she is unable to recognize the truth now that the governments lies about covid and its restrictions have been exposed. She can't change her stance on covid and the restrictions because she supported the coercion of others and that now means she helped harm others so it's easier on her mentally to continue pushing the lie than to admit what she was a part of.
I try no to discuss c19 with my covidian coworkers, but in a momentary lapse, I mentioned a previous co-worker had left Canada to return to Germany (she'd been in the process of immigration in Canada) and mentioned to our common friend that she'd left Canada to escape the authoritarian civil rights abuses, and my covidian co-worker retorted: "there were no civil rights lost", I said whatever, the lady left for those reasons, and ended the conversation.
That covidian weighs over 300lbs, has no education in the sciences, and is a total conformist, which in Canada means completely woke.
"Conformist" used to mean right-wing/conservatism/religion, but in today's Canada wokeism is the new institutionalism.
I am genuinely puzzled by the "blindness" of those promoting coercion, which is not only a violation of constitutional rights and international human rights, but violates informed consent.
Fear. Its all about fear. With enough fear you can convince most humans to commit and or support atrocities with the promise that it will make their fear go away.
We cannot justify making incest illegal based on it being immoral. It's illegal because it involves sexual acts with minors. If we justify it being illegal based on morality we open eth door for more bans against things based on morality and the government must never be allowed to make something illegal solely because it's immoral. They have already done this (ie drugs) but it's still dangerous to keep doing it or support it.
I was using teh example to emphasize how important it is not to justify even the worst of immoral examples as being OK to use the violnec.e of government and make illegal because its based on morality.
All that said, it wasn't that far back that women under 18 getting married and having kids was common and to that sometimes within the same family; act's we consider immoral today.
This woman may have a PHD (and from her comments she seems to think that makes her smarter/wiser than those without a PHD ) in medicine but she's just as susceptible as anyone else to the mass hysteria that forces people into believing a lie like the one the government has been pushing about covid. Where she falls short is where she is unable to recognize the truth now that the governments lies about covid and its restrictions have been exposed. She can't change her stance on covid and the restrictions because she supported the coercion of others and that now means she helped harm others so it's easier on her mentally to continue pushing the lie than to admit what she was a part of.
I pity this woman.
I try no to discuss c19 with my covidian coworkers, but in a momentary lapse, I mentioned a previous co-worker had left Canada to return to Germany (she'd been in the process of immigration in Canada) and mentioned to our common friend that she'd left Canada to escape the authoritarian civil rights abuses, and my covidian co-worker retorted: "there were no civil rights lost", I said whatever, the lady left for those reasons, and ended the conversation.
That covidian weighs over 300lbs, has no education in the sciences, and is a total conformist, which in Canada means completely woke.
"Conformist" used to mean right-wing/conservatism/religion, but in today's Canada wokeism is the new institutionalism.
I am genuinely puzzled by the "blindness" of those promoting coercion, which is not only a violation of constitutional rights and international human rights, but violates informed consent.
Fear. Its all about fear. With enough fear you can convince most humans to commit and or support atrocities with the promise that it will make their fear go away.
We cannot justify making incest illegal based on it being immoral. It's illegal because it involves sexual acts with minors. If we justify it being illegal based on morality we open eth door for more bans against things based on morality and the government must never be allowed to make something illegal solely because it's immoral. They have already done this (ie drugs) but it's still dangerous to keep doing it or support it.
I only used incest in the special case of two adults.
I was using teh example to emphasize how important it is not to justify even the worst of immoral examples as being OK to use the violnec.e of government and make illegal because its based on morality.
All that said, it wasn't that far back that women under 18 getting married and having kids was common and to that sometimes within the same family; act's we consider immoral today.
And cousin marriage is pretty much mainstream in Iran, where my family comes from.
Mark - Has that not lead to genetic related issues with the inbreeding?