The soft sciences are rich with deep unifying explanations, whereas not so much for the hard sciences
www.loofwired.com
People mistakenly believe the hard sciences like physics are more amenable to elegant grand unifying theories than the wispy soft sciences like psychology or biology. The flaw in that is that physics hasn’t undergone selection forces to DO anything, whereas the biology and psychology has, and its design can often be elegantly explained.
The soft sciences are rich with deep unifying explanations, whereas not so much for the hard sciences
The soft sciences are rich with deep unifying…
The soft sciences are rich with deep unifying explanations, whereas not so much for the hard sciences
People mistakenly believe the hard sciences like physics are more amenable to elegant grand unifying theories than the wispy soft sciences like psychology or biology. The flaw in that is that physics hasn’t undergone selection forces to DO anything, whereas the biology and psychology has, and its design can often be elegantly explained.