I have been saying this and sharing data for nearly 2 years; many people are not interested in the truth even when confronted with facts. I honestly can't wrap my mind around their lack of critical thinking. It makes no sense to me.
- For a vaccine that has more like 30% to 70% efficacy, not at all the claimed 95% efficacy.
The evidence for any benefit let alone 95% or even 30% is thinner than gossamer and hangs on data adjustments based on models of population and vax uptake that themselves are subject to significant error and bias, which take raw morbidity and mortality data inputs and transform them. The most jabbed jurisdictions did worst in covid, and it’s not just demographics—similarly aged and/or obese populations that did not go jab crazy did better. You’ve been a godsend throughout and this is an unregulated platform for the moment. Pull no punches.
I assume you’re familiar with Norm Fenton and Martin Neil’s work showing what happens to vax efficacy calculations when you cohort surveillance data properly especially all cause mortality data. New tech lacking longer to medium term safety data indeed. We’re still a trick or two shy of having a handle on mRNA as a drug platform, clearly seen from last 15 years of study, even if urgent circumstance demanded otherwise.
I have been saying this and sharing data for nearly 2 years; many people are not interested in the truth even when confronted with facts. I honestly can't wrap my mind around their lack of critical thinking. It makes no sense to me.
Being "offered" to 5-11 yr olds in UK from April and adults still in denial, even though the first vaccine damage claims have gone in.
- For a vaccine that has more like 30% to 70% efficacy, not at all the claimed 95% efficacy.
The evidence for any benefit let alone 95% or even 30% is thinner than gossamer and hangs on data adjustments based on models of population and vax uptake that themselves are subject to significant error and bias, which take raw morbidity and mortality data inputs and transform them. The most jabbed jurisdictions did worst in covid, and it’s not just demographics—similarly aged and/or obese populations that did not go jab crazy did better. You’ve been a godsend throughout and this is an unregulated platform for the moment. Pull no punches.
I assume you’re familiar with Norm Fenton and Martin Neil’s work showing what happens to vax efficacy calculations when you cohort surveillance data properly especially all cause mortality data. New tech lacking longer to medium term safety data indeed. We’re still a trick or two shy of having a handle on mRNA as a drug platform, clearly seen from last 15 years of study, even if urgent circumstance demanded otherwise.