Reading through Fifth Circuit judgement on social media censorship and the First Amendment, which appears to unambiguously say social media does not have a right to muzzle the voices of its members.
More as I digest.
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/22417924/5th-circuit-netchoice-v-paxton.pd
Mark - With the ruling of Citizens United recognizing corporations as a person (if I understand the ruling correctly ) shouldn't that mean that when it comes to free speech the private corporation should be treated the same as if it was a person censoring the speech and not a business?