2 Comments
Nov 3, 2022Liked by Mark Changizi

Kudos to you, Mark and the other plaintiffs for the courage and principles to push back against a pernicious anti-Constitutional stance. This amicus brief is thorough, well-argued & powerful!

Frustrating that people like Murthy & Becerra r never compelled to examine whether their censorship WORKED as intended.

Here’s what all the censorship did NOT do: Improve compliance or confidence.

Here's what all the censorship DID do *successfully”:

irreparably eroded trust in science, the medical profession, politicians

prevented critically needed discussion on solutions that could’ve prevented deaths

fostered intense anger

led to polarization

ramped up the contempt of the censoring cohort

destroyed science w/an overcertain message that the science has spoken

engendered resistance

destroyed careers of previously lauded scientists/doctors

created self-censorship

put the policy reins in the hands of authoritarians

lowered vaccination rates of previous childhood vaccines

put double-standards on ‘roids

damaged democracy on the absurd altar of *saving democracy*

Gonna stop here but not because this list is complete.

Expand full comment

https://jasonpowers.substack.com/p/the-great-game-2022

What a wicked game we are in. Stay frosty.

Expand full comment