Four and a half years of impression and new-follower data from Twitter tells the story of censorship
And Twitter is still sick
More than four years of impression and new-follow data from Twitter, through various bouts of censorship and deboosting.
(1) Note the rapid rise during the first year of COVID before censorship began in earnest.
(2) By April 2021, Biden had begun censoring, and you can see the rapid fall-off (left end of horizontal double arrow).
(3) At some point over the next months, in addition to being temporarily suspended multiple times and permanently suspended once -- and reinstated -- Twitter labeled my account "sensitive content," which lasted until around Feb 2023, only after I appear to have (months earlier) managed to reach Ella Irwin, the VP of Trust and Safety at Twitter, who had sufficiently few followers that she appeared to actually notice my appeals to her in posts and DMs. Without that, I might well be still treated as "sensitive."
(4) In spite of no longer being labeled "sensitive," my almost two years of tweets while under that label are STILL labeled as such, and many cannot view them.
(5) While my release from "sensitive content" led to a noticeable increase (right end of horizontal double arrow), except for a month or two, my impressions and new followings has been (a) well below the initiation of Biden censorship, and (b) inexorably falling.
(6) Note the rise of monetization in July 2023, after which there appears to be a steady decline, as the mechanisms selectively favor rabble rousers who induce turmoil in the comments.
Our only free-speech-friendly social network is a basket case.
Really shouldn't be a surprise. The hype about Musk freeing the bird, free speech was always unwarranted. But clever marketing. Truth in advertising would've said "free-er speech." Not to be confused with "free speech." Because all he ever promised was freedom of speech, not freedom of reach. Which many hopeful returnees to Twitter, who had fled it due to censorship are enduring what you are. Bait and Switch.
If Twitter hadn't become "free-er speech" and remained as censorious totalitarian as it had been under Dorsey imagine if all those users like you had found another platform dedicated to true Freedom of Speech AND Reach? The false and deceptive marketing of "free-er speech" as "free speech stemmed the loss of users and content and even attracted people back (like you). Which was the objective. Imagine if Truth, Gettr, Gab, Telegram, etc had been the beneficiaries of the Twitter/X flight if they had understood that Twitter/X would still shadow-ban them, demonitize, reduce their visibility?
https://www.tweaktown.com/news/86931/elon-musk-explains-what-freedom-of-speech-will-look-like-on-twitter/index.html
Elon Musk, July 27, 2022:
"It's free speech within the context of the law. So it's not - I'm definitely not suggesting that we flout the law cause we'll get shut down if that's the case. And I think there's also there's freedom of speech or freedom of reach." "So I think that people should be allowed to say pretty outrageous things that are within the bounds of the law, but then...(it) doesn't get amplified, it doesn't get a ton of reach."
Musk declared this when he first acquired Twitter:
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1593673339826212864
"Elon Musk
@elonmusk
New Twitter policy is freedom of speech, but not freedom of reach.
Negative/hate tweets will be max deboosted & demonetized, so no ads or other revenue to Twitter.
You won’t find the tweet unless you specifically seek it out, which is no different from rest of Internet.
1:31 PM · Nov 18, 2022"
Twitter's (X) Official policy:
Freedom of Speech, Not Reach: An update on our enforcement philosophy
April 17, 2023
https://blog.x.com/en_us/topics/product/2023/freedom-of-speech-not-reach-an-update-on-our-enforcement-philosophy
Musk boasting about his reduction in :Hate Speech Impressions" ("hate" as defined by????)"
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1595630109116989440
Musk and his censorious CEO Yaccarino:
https://chiefmarketer.com/twitters-musk-touts-new-freedom-of-speech-not-freedom-of-reach-moderation-policy/