Feds threatened. Big Tech did as asked. But… coincidence
Our First Amendment case dismissed
Both my case w/ Michael Senger & Daniel Kotzin, and Justin Hart’s case — each on coercion of Big Tech in violation of the First Amendment — were dismissed on the same day because of insufficient evidence of coercion.
Feds threatened. Big Tech did as asked. But… coincidence.
More to come…
Yesterday was a disappointing day for those who believe in an open debate of ideas.
The cases of @justin_hart and @MarkChangizi were unfortunately both dismissed by courts. Links below:
Hart v. Facebook
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Changizi v. HHS
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
And, some states are getting the same idea…
I'm so sorry, Mark. Thank you for fighting, and I look forward to seeing what form the next battle takes.
Federal Courts do not like dealing with First Amendment cases when they involve BigTech. Not sure if its the spineless coward syndrome many judges have when the Feds are involved or if its the corrupt/sellout syndrome. Constituonal Lawyer Robert Barnes at Barnes law goes on a lot about how bad the judicial system has gotten, how cowardly many judges have become to the Federal government. When you know the Feds have no issue with using intel agencies to go after political enemies I guess its no surprise judges fear them.